<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google PageRank</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.softtechreviews.com/general/google-pagerank/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.softtechreviews.com/general/google-pagerank/</link>
	<description>Software, technology, reviews and more.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 19:02:38 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Alisha</title>
		<link>http://www.softtechreviews.com/general/google-pagerank/comment-page-1/#comment-13501</link>
		<dc:creator>Alisha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Oct 2007 05:36:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.softtechreviews.com/general/google-pagerank/#comment-13501</guid>
		<description>Thanks for sharing that link, I didn&#039;t read it until now. As long as my PageRank stays at a three (so I can feel loved by Google?), Google can update all it wants.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for sharing that link, I didn&#8217;t read it until now. As long as my PageRank stays at a three (so I can feel loved by Google?), Google can update all it wants.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Foo</title>
		<link>http://www.softtechreviews.com/general/google-pagerank/comment-page-1/#comment-13500</link>
		<dc:creator>The Foo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Oct 2007 05:15:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.softtechreviews.com/general/google-pagerank/#comment-13500</guid>
		<description>Here is an interesting twist on Andy Beard&#039;s site (if you haven&#039;t already read it):

http://andybeard.eu/2007/10/pagerank-update-2.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is an interesting twist on Andy Beard&#8217;s site (if you haven&#8217;t already read it):</p>
<p><a href="http://andybeard.eu/2007/10/pagerank-update-2.html" rel="nofollow">http://andybeard.eu/2007/10/pagerank-update-2.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Foo</title>
		<link>http://www.softtechreviews.com/general/google-pagerank/comment-page-1/#comment-13499</link>
		<dc:creator>The Foo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Oct 2007 04:51:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.softtechreviews.com/general/google-pagerank/#comment-13499</guid>
		<description>it could be a bit of everything but the major part is i think excessive linking and text links. Darren Rowse didn&#039;t have text links ads but lots of text links in his post -- so does John Chow, Engadget, Forbes and all the others that dropped badly. Honestly don&#039;t think they&#039;ll penalize you for taking off adsense... if they did, that&#039;s just not right. I can see why they&#039;ll penalize you for lots of text links and text link ads though.

the fuzzy part about it now is whether google will penalize you for not having no follow tags. But by your blog PR increase, it doesn&#039;t seem to be a problem.

In my blog I link a lot (in posts) and my PR is still the same -- which further contradicts what I just said about text links. Only Google knows exactly how their search engines work. Someone leaking out their secrets could earn a lot of money!

at the end of the day, you and Darren Rowce is right -- don&#039;t worry about PR but the quality of your blog posts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it could be a bit of everything but the major part is i think excessive linking and text links. Darren Rowse didn&#8217;t have text links ads but lots of text links in his post &#8212; so does John Chow, Engadget, Forbes and all the others that dropped badly. Honestly don&#8217;t think they&#8217;ll penalize you for taking off adsense&#8230; if they did, that&#8217;s just not right. I can see why they&#8217;ll penalize you for lots of text links and text link ads though.</p>
<p>the fuzzy part about it now is whether google will penalize you for not having no follow tags. But by your blog PR increase, it doesn&#8217;t seem to be a problem.</p>
<p>In my blog I link a lot (in posts) and my PR is still the same &#8212; which further contradicts what I just said about text links. Only Google knows exactly how their search engines work. Someone leaking out their secrets could earn a lot of money!</p>
<p>at the end of the day, you and Darren Rowce is right &#8212; don&#8217;t worry about PR but the quality of your blog posts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
